![]() Indeed, a contractor will merely index his General Conditions billing according to the overall level or degree of completion of the works not the value of his general conditions (which he can only derive from payroll records and receipts). Therefore there must be a scalable monetization within the middle-ground of 0 – 100% degree of satisfaction of the requirement that can be calculated into dollars. This doesn’t help facilitate a claim.ĭespite the inscrutability, it follows that if all of a contractor’s works were defective, than he would be entitled to 0% General Conditions. The second, larger challenge lies in the valuation of soft-costs that tend to be assessed only subjectively. Then factoring a percentage of that to the actual value. The first is in assessing a contract value to any given component of the General Conditions pertaining to a claim. ![]() Either as a means of merely saving the contractor some time, a few dollars, or because he simply doesn’t know better.Įven the most seasoned construction attorneys struggle mightily with Standard of Care as it pertains to a contractor or architect’s basic responsibilities in facilitating the General Requirements portion of the contract found in the specifications. Also that some elements of the general conditions of the contract are not being fulfilled. Whenever a project is failing in a general or specific way, you can be sure that the contractor is not making good on his Standard of Care. There are many moving parts within each of these responsibilities.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |